The Aspect of Perspectiveness of the English Verbs

Marharyta Alsultan

Abstract


The category of perspectiveness has long been the subject for research of many scientists. It is defined as the concept of an action that has to happen in the near future and it reflects understanding of action inevitability. In the given paper the author describes the category of perspectiveness linguistically using onomasiological approach. Since linguistic expression allows to distinguish between several shades of action, we can say that the category of perspectiveness is represented by a number of separate conceptual situations, including the “intention” (“intentionality”), “willingness to join the action”, “approximation to the entry into action”, “inevitability”. These four features make up the structure of the linguistic category under analysis. In the course of investigation it was discovered that each logical stage of the perspectiveness category is associated with particular linguistic expressive means. The observed means were selected and analyzed according to each phase of perspectiveness in the context. The works of literature used in the research were “The Picture of Dorian Gray” by O. Wilde and “The Lady of the Camellias” by A. Dumas (son). This analysis stated the frequency of these verbal means use in linguistic discourse with the help of ranking method.

Key words: perspectiveness, linguistic discourse, future, hypothetical, probability, intentionality, verbal means. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Admoni, V.G. (1975). The status of the generalized grammatical meaning in the system of language. Questions of linguistics, 1, 39-54.

Allen, R. (2001). The Oxford Illustrated English Dictionary. Moscow: Rassvet.

Allen, W.S. (1974). Living English Structure. London: Longman.

Bally, Sh. (1955). General linguistics and questions of the French. Moscow: Books in foreign languages.

Barhudarov, L.S. (1973). Grammar of the English language. Moscow: High school.

Brunner, K. (2008). History of English. Moscow: Rassvet Dumas, Alexandre fils. (2013). La Dame Aux Camélias. [Online]. Available:

http://www.litmir.net/br/?b=125270

Fedorov, R.V. (2010). Structure of aspectual category of perspectiveness. [Online]. Available http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/struktura-aspektualnoy-kategorii prospektivnosti

Gaponova, Y.V. (2007). Means of expressing the modal values of the possibility and necessity in print advertising texts. Kaliningrad.

Kolshansky, G.V. (1991). To the question of the content of the language category of the modality. Questions of linguistics, 1, 94-98.

Maysak, T.A. (2000). Grammaticalization of verbs of motion: the experience of the typology Questions of linguistics, 2, 14-18.

Meie, A. (2003). The main features of the Germanic group of languages. Moscow: High school.

Nedyalkov, V.P. (1987). Initiatory and means of its expression in different types of languages. Theory of functional grammar. Introduction. Aspectuality. Temporary localization. 12, 34-39.

Plotkin, V.Y. (1975). Grammar Systems in English. Kishinev: Shtiintsa.

Ryanskaya, E.M. (2002). Prospection as a part of aspectuality. Philology, 4, 56-62.

Ryanskaya, E.M. (2002). Methods of action in the cognitive aspect. St. Petersburg: Monograph.

Slyusareva, N.A. (1986). Problems of Functional Morphology of Modern English. Moscow: Science.

Verkhovskaya, I.P. (1980). Time-type forms in the English compound sentence. M: High school.

Wilde, O. (2010). The Picture of Dorian Gray. Oxford: Collins Classics.

Yartseva, V.N. (1995). Hierarchy of grammatical categories and typological characteristics of languages. Moscow: Science.

Zelenetsky, A.L. (2004). Comparative Typology of Major European Languages. Moscow.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Based on a work at http://www.ijssh.ielas.org