ACTION RESEARCH ATTITUDE OF TEACHER-RESEARCHERS IN A SCHOOLS-DISTRICT IN QUIRINO PROVINCE, PHILIPPINES

Authors

  • Miguel U. Nicolas, Jr.* Principal II, Department of Education, Schools Division Office-Quirino, Philippines
  • Sebastian S. Ignacio Public Schools District Supervisor, Department of Education, Schools Division Office-Quirino, Philippines
  • Romiro G. Bautista International Relations Officer, Quirino State University, Philippines

Keywords:

Action Research, Research Attitude, Lackadaisical Attitude.

Abstract

Within the realm of educational research, understanding educators' attitudes towards various aspects of the research process holds paramount importance. This study delves into such attitudes, unveiling valuable insights into prevailing dispositions among respondents. Notably, a substantial high lackadaisical attitude is prevalent, notably concerning action research execution, personal interest, research application, and research-related apprehensions. Conversely, respondents exhibit a more balanced perspective in approaching research difficulties, showcasing a moderate lackadaisical stance that contrasts with the pronounced attitudes observed in other dimensions. The significance of these findings is rooted in their potential implications for refining educational practices. To address the identified high lackadaisical attitudes, tailored interventions are recommended, including strategies to enhance action research engagement, nurture personal interest, alleviate research anxiety, and promote research utilization. Capitalizing on the moderate lackadaisical attitude towards research challenges presents an opportunity for proactive approaches to surmounting obstacles. In essence, these insights form a bedrock for shaping future educational initiatives, fostering a culture of proactive inquiry and enriching the landscape of research engagement within the educational context.

References

Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research, Educational Action Research, 1:1, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102

Bautista, RG. (2021). Paid academic services with mercy and compassion: Phenomenologizing the lived experiences of research mercenaries In the Philippines. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 5335-5340 https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.2174

Burnes, B. (2020). The origin of Lewin’s three-step model of change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 32-59.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319892685

Chow, K., Chu, S., Tavares, N., & Lee, C. (2015) ‘Teachers as researchers: A discovery of their emerging role and impact through a school–university collaborative research’. Brock Education Journal, 24 (2), 20–39. Online. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v24i2.374

Cloonan, A. (2019). Collaborative teacher research: integrating professional learning and university study. Australian Educational Researcher; v.46 n.3 p.385-403; July 2019, 46(3), 385–403. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.223547

Coghlan, D., & Jacobs, C. (2005). Kurt Lewin on Reeducation: Foundations for Action Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305277275

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2005). Attitude Research in the 21st Century: The Current State of Knowledge. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 743–767). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 151-163.

https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.197941

James, F. & Augustin, D. (2018) ‘Improving teachers’ pedagogical and instructional practice through action research: Potential and problems’. Educational Action Research, 26 (2), 333–48. Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1332655

Estrada, A., Batanero, C., & Lancaster, S. (2011). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Statistics. In: Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C. (eds) Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_18

Guerrero-Hernández, G.R. and Fernández-Ugalde, R.A. (2020). ‘Teachers as researchers: Reflecting on the challenges of research–practice partnerships between school and university in Chile’. London Review of Education, 18 (3), 423–38. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.3.07

Hernandez, RM., Valer, EM., Benito, OM., Ortega Pauta, BI., Saavedra-Lopez, MA., & Calle-Ramirez, XM. (2022). Index of attitude towards scientific research in Peruvian psychology students: International Journal of Education and Practice, 10 (2), 204-213. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i2.3046

Manfra, M. (2019). Action research and systematic intentional change in teaching practice. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821132

Pesti, C., Győri, J., & Kopp, E. (2018). ‘Student teachers as future researchers: How do Hungarian and Austrian initial teacher education systems address the issue of teachers as researchers?’. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8 (3), 35–57. Online. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.518

Sanchez, K. D., Malinao, C. M. & Bautista, R. G. (2017). UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WRITING: A BURDEN OR A KEY TO SUCCESS? QSU-CTE Journal of Educational Practices and Standards, 2(1).

Valeroso, I.G. (2022). Assessing the Lackadaisical Attitudes of ISU Faculty in Performing Educational Research. Isabela State University.

Waweru, I. K., & Kyakuha, M. (2020). Attitude towards research among masters students in Makerere University Business School (MUBS), Uganda. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 4(2), 42-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2020.50

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05

How to Cite

Miguel U. Nicolas, Jr.*, Sebastian S. Ignacio, & Romiro G. Bautista. (2023). ACTION RESEARCH ATTITUDE OF TEACHER-RESEARCHERS IN A SCHOOLS-DISTRICT IN QUIRINO PROVINCE, PHILIPPINES. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (IJSSH), 8(2), 106–117. Retrieved from http://ijssh.ielas.org/index.php/ijssh/article/view/74